Gear Material Selection: Case Hardening Steel Compared with Through-Hardening Steel
Compare case hardening vs through-hardening gear steels, including 20CrMnTi and 40Cr, load capacity, wear resistance, and material selection impact.
topic: Gear Materials — Case Hardening Steel vs Through-Hardening Steel
Gear Material Selection: Case Hardening Steel Compared with Through-Hardening Steel
Material choice sits at the centre of gear design. It governs how long a transmission lasts, how much load it can carry, and what it costs to manufacture. Two families dominate industrial practice: 20CrMnTi, a case hardening steel, and 40Cr, a through-hardening steel. Where impact and wear are severe, the carburizing route is normally the right answer; where loads are medium-to-low and volumes are high, through-hardening is usually sufficient. Choose wrongly and the result is premature pitting or tooth fracture, which undermines equipment reliability.
1. How the Two Families Compare
The table below sets the two routes side by side across the properties that matter most during design.
- Dimension Surface Hardness: 58~62 HRC (very high)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): 28~35 HRC (moderate)
- Dimension Core Toughness: High (low-C martensite/bainite)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Moderate (tempered sorbite)
- Dimension Case Depth: 0.8~1.5 mm (controllable)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Uniform throughout
- Dimension Contact Fatigue Strength: Very high (≥1500 MPa)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Moderate (800~1000 MPa)
- Dimension Bending Fatigue Strength: High (supported by tough core)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Medium-high (uniform)
- Dimension Wear Resistance: Excellent
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Fair
- Dimension Impact Resistance: Excellent
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Moderate
- Dimension Machining Difficulty: Requires grinding (hard after HT)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): Can use hobbing directly
- Dimension Relative Cost Ratio: 1.0 (baseline)
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): 0.55~0.70
- Dimension Typical Applications: Auto transmissions, construction machinery
- Through-Hardening (40Cr): General gearboxes, agricultural machinery
What This Means in Practice
Contact stress verification comes first. A design where σ_H ≥ 1200 MPa calls for case hardening steel. Where σ_H ≤ 900 MPa, through-hardening steel is adequate. Designs falling between those two figures need a combined assessment that brings in the impact factor K_A.
2. Material Definitions and Grade Tables
2.1 Case Hardening Grades
Case hardening steels are low-carbon alloy steels, generally 0.15%~0.25% C, that are carburized and quenched to produce a hard shell over a tough core.
| Core Hardness | Grade | Standard | Surface Hardness After Carburizing |
|---|---|---|---|
| 30~42 HRC | 20CrMnTi | GB/T 3077 | 58~62 HRC |
| 30~40 HRC | 20CrMo | GB/T 3077 | 58~62 HRC |
| 30~42 HRC | 8620H | SAE J1268 | 58~62 HRC |
| 35~43 HRC | 18CrNiMo7-6 | EN 10084 | 58~62 HRC |
2.2 Through-Hardening Grades
Through-hardening steels are medium-carbon steels, typically 0.35%~0.55% C. Quenching followed by high-temperature tempering gives a uniform tempered martensite or sorbite structure across the whole cross-section.
| Hardness Range After Q&T | Grade | Standard |
|---|---|---|
| 28~35 HRC | 40Cr | GB/T 3077 |
| 32~39 HRC | 42CrMo | GB/T 3077 |
| 28~38 HRC | 4140 | ASTM A29 |
| 20~28 HRC | S45C | JIS G4051 |
3. Cross-Referencing Grades Internationally
Export projects and material substitutions both depend on a reliable cross-reference.
| Type | China GB | USA SAE/AISI | EU EN |
|---|---|---|---|
| Carburizing | 20CrMnTi | No direct match | 18CrMo4 (approx.) |
| Carburizing | 20CrMo | 4118 / 4120 | 18CrMo4 |
| Carburizing (high toughness) | 18CrNiMo7-6 | 4817 (approx.) | 18CrNiMo7-6 |
| Q&T | 40Cr | 5140 | 41Cr4 |
| Q&T (high strength) | 42CrMo | 4140 | 42CrMo4 |
One point deserves attention: 20CrMnTi is a China-specific grade. Export projects should substitute 18CrMo4 or 8620H, with the change confirmed through a technical agreement.
PinyiGear supplies a full range of custom gear solutions, including spur gears, bevel gears, and helical gears. The engineering team is available to discuss material selection for specific applications.
4. Choosing Between the Two Routes
The decision follows operating conditions through to a material family.
graph TD
A[Input: Operating Conditions] --> B{Contact Stress σ_H?}
B -->|σ_H ≥ 1200 MPa| C[Case Hardening Steel]
B -->|σ_H ≤ 900 MPa| D[Through-Hardening Steel]
B -->|900 < σ_H < 1200| E{High Impact / K_A?}
E -->|Yes| C
E -->|No| D
C --> F[Requires Gear Grinding]
D --> G[Hobbing + Finish OK]
4.1 Process Route for Case Hardening
Blank → Forging → Normalizing → Rough Turning → Hobbing → Carburizing+Quench → Gear Grinding → NDT Inspection
For post-carburizing finishing, PinyiGear provides high-precision gear grinding and machining services.
4.2 Process Route for Through-Hardening
Blank → Forging → Q&T Treatment → Rough Turning → Finish Turning → Hobbing → Surface Treatment (blackening/phosphating) → Inspection
5. Source Documents
- GB/T 3077-2015 “Alloy Structural Steels”
- AGMA 2001-D04 “Rating the Pitting Resistance and Bending Strength”
- ISO 6336 “Calculation of Load Capacity of Spur and Helical Gears”
- “Gear Materials and Heat Treatment” — Gear Handbook, Chapter 3
Daily Learning Note — July 22, 2026
Related reading
- ProductSpur and Helical Gears Machined to Customer Drawing
- TechnicalGear Material Selection: Decision Framework from 20CrMnTi to 42CrMo
- TechnicalComparing Gear Steels: 20CrMnTi, 40Cr, 42CrMo and 17CrNiMo6
- TechnicalGear Heat Treatment Selection Guide: Induction Hardening, Nitriding and Carburizing Compared
